From: Jakub Sitnicki Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 12:41:44 +0000 (+0100) Subject: bpf, sockmap: Check for any of tcp_bpf_prots when cloning a listener X-Git-Tag: v6.1.15~515 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=12b0ec7c6953e1602957926439e5297095d7d065;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-starfive.git bpf, sockmap: Check for any of tcp_bpf_prots when cloning a listener [ Upstream commit ddce1e091757d0259107c6c0c7262df201de2b66 ] A listening socket linked to a sockmap has its sk_prot overridden. It points to one of the struct proto variants in tcp_bpf_prots. The variant depends on the socket's family and which sockmap programs are attached. A child socket cloned from a TCP listener initially inherits their sk_prot. But before cloning is finished, we restore the child's proto to the listener's original non-tcp_bpf_prots one. This happens in tcp_create_openreq_child -> tcp_bpf_clone. Today, in tcp_bpf_clone we detect if the child's proto should be restored by checking only for the TCP_BPF_BASE proto variant. This is not correct. The sk_prot of listening socket linked to a sockmap can point to to any variant in tcp_bpf_prots. If the listeners sk_prot happens to be not the TCP_BPF_BASE variant, then the child socket unintentionally is left if the inherited sk_prot by tcp_bpf_clone. This leads to issues like infinite recursion on close [1], because the child state is otherwise not set up for use with tcp_bpf_prot operations. Adjust the check in tcp_bpf_clone to detect all of tcp_bpf_prots variants. Note that it wouldn't be sufficient to check the socket state when overriding the sk_prot in tcp_bpf_update_proto in order to always use the TCP_BPF_BASE variant for listening sockets. Since commit b8b8315e39ff ("bpf, sockmap: Remove unhash handler for BPF sockmap usage") it is possible for a socket to transition to TCP_LISTEN state while already linked to a sockmap, e.g. connect() -> insert into map -> connect(AF_UNSPEC) -> listen(). [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/00000000000073b14905ef2e7401@google.com/ Fixes: e80251555f0b ("tcp_bpf: Don't let child socket inherit parent protocol ops on copy") Reported-by: syzbot+04c21ed96d861dccc5cd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki Acked-by: John Fastabend Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230113-sockmap-fix-v2-2-1e0ee7ac2f90@cloudflare.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- diff --git a/include/linux/util_macros.h b/include/linux/util_macros.h index 72299f2..43db6e4 100644 --- a/include/linux/util_macros.h +++ b/include/linux/util_macros.h @@ -38,4 +38,16 @@ */ #define find_closest_descending(x, a, as) __find_closest(x, a, as, >=) +/** + * is_insidevar - check if the @ptr points inside the @var memory range. + * @ptr: the pointer to a memory address. + * @var: the variable which address and size identify the memory range. + * + * Evaluates to true if the address in @ptr lies within the memory + * range allocated to @var. + */ +#define is_insidevar(ptr, var) \ + ((uintptr_t)(ptr) >= (uintptr_t)(var) && \ + (uintptr_t)(ptr) < (uintptr_t)(var) + sizeof(var)) + #endif diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c index 94aad38..cf26d65 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bpf.c @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include @@ -639,10 +640,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tcp_bpf_update_proto); */ void tcp_bpf_clone(const struct sock *sk, struct sock *newsk) { - int family = sk->sk_family == AF_INET6 ? TCP_BPF_IPV6 : TCP_BPF_IPV4; struct proto *prot = newsk->sk_prot; - if (prot == &tcp_bpf_prots[family][TCP_BPF_BASE]) + if (is_insidevar(prot, tcp_bpf_prots)) newsk->sk_prot = sk->sk_prot_creator; } #endif /* CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL */