From: Konstantin Khlebnikov Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 23:36:50 +0000 (-0800) Subject: mm: replace vma_lock_anon_vma with anon_vma_lock_read/write X-Git-Tag: v4.14-rc1~3866^2~5 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=12352d3cae2cebe18805a91fab34b534d7444231;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git mm: replace vma_lock_anon_vma with anon_vma_lock_read/write Sequence vma_lock_anon_vma() - vma_unlock_anon_vma() isn't safe if anon_vma appeared between lock and unlock. We have to check anon_vma first or call anon_vma_prepare() to be sure that it's here. There are only few users of these legacy helpers. Let's get rid of them. This patch fixes anon_vma lock imbalance in validate_mm(). Write lock isn't required here, read lock is enough. And reorders expand_downwards/expand_upwards: security_mmap_addr() and wrapping-around check don't have to be under anon vma lock. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CACT4Y+Y908EjM2z=706dv4rV6dWtxTLK9nFg9_7DhRMLppBo2g@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov Acked-by: Kirill A. Shutemov Cc: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/include/linux/rmap.h b/include/linux/rmap.h index bdf597c..a07f42b 100644 --- a/include/linux/rmap.h +++ b/include/linux/rmap.h @@ -109,20 +109,6 @@ static inline void put_anon_vma(struct anon_vma *anon_vma) __put_anon_vma(anon_vma); } -static inline void vma_lock_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma) -{ - struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma; - if (anon_vma) - down_write(&anon_vma->root->rwsem); -} - -static inline void vma_unlock_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma) -{ - struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma; - if (anon_vma) - up_write(&anon_vma->root->rwsem); -} - static inline void anon_vma_lock_write(struct anon_vma *anon_vma) { down_write(&anon_vma->root->rwsem); diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c index 918c9ec..2f2415a 100644 --- a/mm/mmap.c +++ b/mm/mmap.c @@ -459,12 +459,16 @@ static void validate_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) struct vm_area_struct *vma = mm->mmap; while (vma) { + struct anon_vma *anon_vma = vma->anon_vma; struct anon_vma_chain *avc; - vma_lock_anon_vma(vma); - list_for_each_entry(avc, &vma->anon_vma_chain, same_vma) - anon_vma_interval_tree_verify(avc); - vma_unlock_anon_vma(vma); + if (anon_vma) { + anon_vma_lock_read(anon_vma); + list_for_each_entry(avc, &vma->anon_vma_chain, same_vma) + anon_vma_interval_tree_verify(avc); + anon_vma_unlock_read(anon_vma); + } + highest_address = vma->vm_end; vma = vma->vm_next; i++; @@ -2145,32 +2149,27 @@ static int acct_stack_growth(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long size, uns int expand_upwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) { struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; - int error; + int error = 0; if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_GROWSUP)) return -EFAULT; - /* - * We must make sure the anon_vma is allocated - * so that the anon_vma locking is not a noop. - */ + /* Guard against wrapping around to address 0. */ + if (address < PAGE_ALIGN(address+4)) + address = PAGE_ALIGN(address+4); + else + return -ENOMEM; + + /* We must make sure the anon_vma is allocated. */ if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma))) return -ENOMEM; - vma_lock_anon_vma(vma); /* * vma->vm_start/vm_end cannot change under us because the caller * is required to hold the mmap_sem in read mode. We need the * anon_vma lock to serialize against concurrent expand_stacks. - * Also guard against wrapping around to address 0. */ - if (address < PAGE_ALIGN(address+4)) - address = PAGE_ALIGN(address+4); - else { - vma_unlock_anon_vma(vma); - return -ENOMEM; - } - error = 0; + anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma); /* Somebody else might have raced and expanded it already */ if (address > vma->vm_end) { @@ -2188,7 +2187,7 @@ int expand_upwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) * updates, but we only hold a shared mmap_sem * lock here, so we need to protect against * concurrent vma expansions. - * vma_lock_anon_vma() doesn't help here, as + * anon_vma_lock_write() doesn't help here, as * we don't guarantee that all growable vmas * in a mm share the same root anon vma. * So, we reuse mm->page_table_lock to guard @@ -2211,7 +2210,7 @@ int expand_upwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address) } } } - vma_unlock_anon_vma(vma); + anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma); khugepaged_enter_vma_merge(vma, vma->vm_flags); validate_mm(mm); return error; @@ -2227,25 +2226,21 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm; int error; - /* - * We must make sure the anon_vma is allocated - * so that the anon_vma locking is not a noop. - */ - if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma))) - return -ENOMEM; - address &= PAGE_MASK; error = security_mmap_addr(address); if (error) return error; - vma_lock_anon_vma(vma); + /* We must make sure the anon_vma is allocated. */ + if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma))) + return -ENOMEM; /* * vma->vm_start/vm_end cannot change under us because the caller * is required to hold the mmap_sem in read mode. We need the * anon_vma lock to serialize against concurrent expand_stacks. */ + anon_vma_lock_write(vma->anon_vma); /* Somebody else might have raced and expanded it already */ if (address < vma->vm_start) { @@ -2263,7 +2258,7 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, * updates, but we only hold a shared mmap_sem * lock here, so we need to protect against * concurrent vma expansions. - * vma_lock_anon_vma() doesn't help here, as + * anon_vma_lock_write() doesn't help here, as * we don't guarantee that all growable vmas * in a mm share the same root anon vma. * So, we reuse mm->page_table_lock to guard @@ -2284,7 +2279,7 @@ int expand_downwards(struct vm_area_struct *vma, } } } - vma_unlock_anon_vma(vma); + anon_vma_unlock_write(vma->anon_vma); khugepaged_enter_vma_merge(vma, vma->vm_flags); validate_mm(mm); return error;