From: neil <neil@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4>
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 02:14:14 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: 	* README.Portability: Small update.
X-Git-Tag: upstream/4.9.2~100325
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=10bfc444b6e08c8d9920b871ec4cdef916aaa59f;p=platform%2Fupstream%2Flinaro-gcc.git

	* README.Portability: Small update.


git-svn-id: svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk@35056 138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
---

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 5fc1ba1..01d6222 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2000-07-16  Neil Booth  <NeilB@earthling.net>
+
+	* README.Portability:  Small update.
+
 2000-07-15  Richard Henderson  <rth@cygnus.com>
 
 	* config/ia64/ia64-protos.h (ia64_move_ok): Prototype.
diff --git a/gcc/README.Portability b/gcc/README.Portability
index cc5fa32..43efc39 100644
--- a/gcc/README.Portability
+++ b/gcc/README.Portability
@@ -50,6 +50,13 @@ should be written
 String literals
 ---------------
 
+Some SGI compilers choke on the parentheses in:-
+
+const char string[] = ("A string");
+
+This is unfortunate since this is what the GNU gettext macro N_
+produces.  You need to find a different way to code it.
+
 K+R C did not allow concatenation of string literals like
 
   "This is a " "single string literal".
@@ -80,8 +87,8 @@ needs to be coded in some other way.
 signed keyword
 --------------
 
-The signed keyword did not exist in K+R comilers, it was introduced in
-ISO C89, so you cannot use it.  In both K+R and standard C,
+The signed keyword did not exist in K+R compilers, it was introduced
+in ISO C89, so you cannot use it.  In both K+R and standard C,
 unqualified char and bitfields may be signed or unsigned.  There is no
 way to portably declare signed chars or signed bitfields.
 
@@ -163,8 +170,9 @@ double respectively.
 Calling functions through pointers to functions
 -----------------------------------------------
 
-K+R C compilers require brackets around the dereferenced pointer
-variable, whereas ISO C relaxes the syntax.  For example
+K+R C compilers require parentheses around the dereferenced function
+pointer expression in the call, whereas ISO C relaxes the syntax.  For
+example
 
 typedef void (* cl_directive_handler) PARAMS ((cpp_reader *, const char *));
       *p->handler (pfile, p->arg);
@@ -192,6 +200,13 @@ will stringify an argument; to get the same result on K+R and ISO
 compilers x should not have spaces around it.
 
 
+Passing structures by value
+---------------------------
+
+Avoid passing structures by value, either to or from functions.  It
+seems some K+R compilers handle this differently or not at all.
+
+
 Enums
 -----