From: Shailendra Verma Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2015 23:58:03 +0000 (-0700) Subject: mm/cma.c: fix typos in comments X-Git-Tag: v4.2-rc1~121^2~17 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0f96ae2928a547b86678688042a9759edcc8285d;p=profile%2Fcommon%2Fplatform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-artik7.git mm/cma.c: fix typos in comments Signed-off-by: Shailendra Verma Acked-by: Michal Nazarewicz Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds --- diff --git a/mm/cma.c b/mm/cma.c index 3a7a67b..6612780 100644 --- a/mm/cma.c +++ b/mm/cma.c @@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ int __init cma_init_reserved_mem(phys_addr_t base, phys_addr_t size, if (!size || !memblock_is_region_reserved(base, size)) return -EINVAL; - /* ensure minimal alignment requied by mm core */ + /* ensure minimal alignment required by mm core */ alignment = PAGE_SIZE << max(MAX_ORDER - 1, pageblock_order); /* alignment should be aligned with order_per_bit */ @@ -238,7 +238,7 @@ int __init cma_declare_contiguous(phys_addr_t base, /* * high_memory isn't direct mapped memory so retrieving its physical * address isn't appropriate. But it would be useful to check the - * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justfiable to get + * physical address of the highmem boundary so it's justifiable to get * the physical address from it. On x86 there is a validation check for * this case, so the following workaround is needed to avoid it. */