From: Quentin Monnet Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 04:27:13 +0000 (-0800) Subject: libbpf: complete list of strings for guessing program type X-Git-Tag: v4.19~1593^2~8^2~1^2~4 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0badd331491097cc3702d05a6dd0264a434712b2;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-rpi.git libbpf: complete list of strings for guessing program type It seems that the type guessing feature for libbpf, based on the name of the ELF section the program is located in, was inspired from samples/bpf/prog_load.c, which was not used by any sample for loading programs of certain types such as TC actions and classifiers, or LWT-related types. As a consequence, libbpf is not able to guess the type of such programs and to load them automatically if type is not provided to the `bpf_load_prog()` function. Add ELF section names associated to those eBPF program types so that they can be loaded with e.g. bpftool as well. Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann --- diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c index 71ddc48..c648403 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c @@ -1816,12 +1816,17 @@ static const struct { BPF_PROG_SEC("socket", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER), BPF_PROG_SEC("kprobe/", BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE), BPF_PROG_SEC("kretprobe/", BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE), + BPF_PROG_SEC("classifier", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS), + BPF_PROG_SEC("action", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT), BPF_PROG_SEC("tracepoint/", BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT), BPF_PROG_SEC("xdp", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP), BPF_PROG_SEC("perf_event", BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT), BPF_PROG_SEC("cgroup/skb", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB), BPF_PROG_SEC("cgroup/sock", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SOCK), BPF_PROG_SEC("cgroup/dev", BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_DEVICE), + BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_in", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN), + BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_out", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT), + BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_xmit", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT), BPF_PROG_SEC("sockops", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCK_OPS), BPF_PROG_SEC("sk_skb", BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_SKB), };