From: nikolay@redhat.com Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:09:42 +0000 (+0000) Subject: bonding: fix bond_release_all inconsistencies X-Git-Tag: v3.9-rc1~139^2~13 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=0896341a44bf04bf6149d9307fe4686006f3eee1;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-exynos.git bonding: fix bond_release_all inconsistencies This patch fixes the following inconsistencies in bond_release_all: - IFF_BONDING flag is not stripped from slaves - MTU is not restored - no netdev notifiers are sent Instead of trying to keep bond_release and bond_release_all in sync I think we can re-use bond_release as the environment for calling it is correct (RTNL is held). I have been running tests for the past week and they came out successful. The only way for bond_release to fail is for the slave to be attached in a different bond or to not be a slave but that cannot happen as RTNL is held and no slave manipulations can be achieved. V2: As suggested bond_release is renamed to __bond_release_one with a new parameter "all" introduced so to avoid calling unnecessary code while destroying a bond, and a wrapper for it called bond_release is created because of ndo_del_link. bond_release_all() is removed. Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c index 94c1534..e242dd1 100644 --- a/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/bond_main.c @@ -1937,7 +1937,8 @@ err_undo_flags: /* * Try to release the slave device from the bond device * It is legal to access curr_active_slave without a lock because all the function - * is write-locked. + * is write-locked. If "all" is true it means that the function is being called + * while destroying a bond interface and all slaves are being released. * * The rules for slave state should be: * for Active/Backup: @@ -1945,7 +1946,9 @@ err_undo_flags: * for Bonded connections: * The first up interface should be left on and all others downed. */ -int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) +static int __bond_release_one(struct net_device *bond_dev, + struct net_device *slave_dev, + bool all) { struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev); struct slave *slave, *oldcurrent; @@ -1982,7 +1985,7 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) synchronize_net(); write_lock_bh(&bond->lock); - if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) { + if (!all && !bond->params.fail_over_mac) { if (ether_addr_equal(bond_dev->dev_addr, slave->perm_hwaddr) && bond->slave_cnt > 1) pr_warning("%s: Warning: the permanent HWaddr of %s - %pM - is still in use by %s. Set the HWaddr of %s to a different address to avoid conflicts.\n", @@ -2028,7 +2031,9 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) write_lock_bh(&bond->lock); } - if (oldcurrent == slave) { + if (all) { + bond->curr_active_slave = NULL; + } else if (oldcurrent == slave) { /* * Note that we hold RTNL over this sequence, so there * is no concern that another slave add/remove event @@ -2117,6 +2122,12 @@ int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) return 0; /* deletion OK */ } +/* A wrapper used because of ndo_del_link */ +int bond_release(struct net_device *bond_dev, struct net_device *slave_dev) +{ + return __bond_release_one(bond_dev, slave_dev, false); +} + /* * First release a slave and then destroy the bond if no more slaves are left. * Must be under rtnl_lock when this function is called. @@ -2138,118 +2149,6 @@ static int bond_release_and_destroy(struct net_device *bond_dev, } /* - * This function releases all slaves. - */ -static int bond_release_all(struct net_device *bond_dev) -{ - struct bonding *bond = netdev_priv(bond_dev); - struct slave *slave; - struct net_device *slave_dev; - struct sockaddr addr; - - write_lock_bh(&bond->lock); - - netif_carrier_off(bond_dev); - - if (bond->slave_cnt == 0) - goto out; - - bond->current_arp_slave = NULL; - bond->primary_slave = NULL; - bond_change_active_slave(bond, NULL); - - while ((slave = bond->first_slave) != NULL) { - /* Inform AD package of unbinding of slave - * before slave is detached from the list. - */ - if (bond->params.mode == BOND_MODE_8023AD) - bond_3ad_unbind_slave(slave); - - slave_dev = slave->dev; - bond_detach_slave(bond, slave); - - /* now that the slave is detached, unlock and perform - * all the undo steps that should not be called from - * within a lock. - */ - write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock); - - /* unregister rx_handler early so bond_handle_frame wouldn't - * be called for this slave anymore. - */ - netdev_rx_handler_unregister(slave_dev); - synchronize_net(); - - if (bond_is_lb(bond)) { - /* must be called only after the slave - * has been detached from the list - */ - bond_alb_deinit_slave(bond, slave); - } - - bond_destroy_slave_symlinks(bond_dev, slave_dev); - bond_del_vlans_from_slave(bond, slave_dev); - - /* If the mode USES_PRIMARY, then we should only remove its - * promisc and mc settings if it was the curr_active_slave, but that was - * already taken care of above when we detached the slave - */ - if (!USES_PRIMARY(bond->params.mode)) { - /* unset promiscuity level from slave */ - if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_PROMISC) - dev_set_promiscuity(slave_dev, -1); - - /* unset allmulti level from slave */ - if (bond_dev->flags & IFF_ALLMULTI) - dev_set_allmulti(slave_dev, -1); - - /* flush master's mc_list from slave */ - netif_addr_lock_bh(bond_dev); - bond_mc_list_flush(bond_dev, slave_dev); - netif_addr_unlock_bh(bond_dev); - } - - bond_upper_dev_unlink(bond_dev, slave_dev); - - slave_disable_netpoll(slave); - - /* close slave before restoring its mac address */ - dev_close(slave_dev); - - if (!bond->params.fail_over_mac) { - /* restore original ("permanent") mac address*/ - memcpy(addr.sa_data, slave->perm_hwaddr, ETH_ALEN); - addr.sa_family = slave_dev->type; - dev_set_mac_address(slave_dev, &addr); - } - - kfree(slave); - - /* re-acquire the lock before getting the next slave */ - write_lock_bh(&bond->lock); - } - - eth_hw_addr_random(bond_dev); - bond->dev_addr_from_first = true; - - if (bond_vlan_used(bond)) { - pr_warning("%s: Warning: clearing HW address of %s while it still has VLANs.\n", - bond_dev->name, bond_dev->name); - pr_warning("%s: When re-adding slaves, make sure the bond's HW address matches its VLANs'.\n", - bond_dev->name); - } - - pr_info("%s: released all slaves\n", bond_dev->name); - -out: - write_unlock_bh(&bond->lock); - - bond_compute_features(bond); - - return 0; -} - -/* * This function changes the active slave to slave . * It returns -EINVAL in the following cases. * - is not found in the list. @@ -4440,7 +4339,9 @@ static void bond_uninit(struct net_device *bond_dev) bond_netpoll_cleanup(bond_dev); /* Release the bonded slaves */ - bond_release_all(bond_dev); + while (bond->first_slave != NULL) + __bond_release_one(bond_dev, bond->first_slave->dev, true); + pr_info("%s: released all slaves\n", bond_dev->name); list_del(&bond->bond_list);