From: Heiko Carstens Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 12:13:56 +0000 (+0100) Subject: [S390] atomic: use ACCESS_ONCE() for atomic_read() X-Git-Tag: v3.0~1788^2~3 X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=03e3b5a0f18c53560de1984fbbfca146d31da2a5;p=platform%2Fkernel%2Flinux-amlogic.git [S390] atomic: use ACCESS_ONCE() for atomic_read() Let's make atomic_read() and atomic_set() behave like on all/most other architectures. Generated code is identical with gcc 4.5.2. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky --- diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h index 76daea1..50cfb5e 100644 --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/atomic.h @@ -36,14 +36,12 @@ static inline int atomic_read(const atomic_t *v) { - barrier(); - return v->counter; + return ACCESS_ONCE(v->counter); } static inline void atomic_set(atomic_t *v, int i) { v->counter = i; - barrier(); } static inline int atomic_add_return(int i, atomic_t *v) @@ -128,14 +126,12 @@ static inline int atomic_add_unless(atomic_t *v, int a, int u) static inline long long atomic64_read(const atomic64_t *v) { - barrier(); - return v->counter; + return ACCESS_ONCE(v->counter); } static inline void atomic64_set(atomic64_t *v, long long i) { v->counter = i; - barrier(); } static inline long long atomic64_add_return(long long i, atomic64_t *v)