From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 15:56:15 +0000 (+0100)
Subject: c++: Don't reject GOTO_EXPRs to cdtor_label in potential_constant_expression_1 [PR104513]
X-Git-Url: http://review.tizen.org/git/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=02a981a8e512934a990d1427d14e8e884409fade;p=test_jj.git

c++: Don't reject GOTO_EXPRs to cdtor_label in potential_constant_expression_1 [PR104513]

return in ctors on targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this () target like arm
is emitted as GOTO_EXPR cdtor_label where at cdtor_label it emits
RETURN_EXPR with the this.
Similarly, in all dtors regardless of targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this ()
a return is emitted similarly.

potential_constant_expression_1 was rejecting these gotos and so we
incorrectly rejected these testcases, but actual cxx_eval* is apparently
handling these just fine.  I was a little bit worried that for the
destruction of bases we wouldn't evaluate something we should, but as the
testcase shows, that is evaluated through try ... finally and there is
nothing after the cdtor_label.  For arm there is RETURN_EXPR this; but we
don't really care about the return value from ctors and dtors during the
constexpr evaluation.

I must say I don't see much the point of cdtor_labels at all, I'd think
that with try ... finally around it for non-arm we could just RETURN_EXPR
instead of the GOTO_EXPR and the try/finally gimplification would DTRT,
and we could just add the right return value for the arm case.

2022-02-14  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>

	PR c++/104513
	* constexpr.cc (potential_constant_expression_1) <case GOTO_EXPR>:
	Don't punt if returns (target).

	* g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-104513.C: New test.
	* g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dtor12.C: New test.
---

diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index 87f3a7b..7274c3b 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -9363,8 +9363,8 @@ potential_constant_expression_1 (tree t, bool want_rval, bool strict, bool now,
     case GOTO_EXPR:
       {
 	tree *target = &TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
-	/* Gotos representing break and continue are OK.  */
-	if (breaks (target) || continues (target))
+	/* Gotos representing break, continue and cdtor return are OK.  */
+	if (breaks (target) || continues (target) || returns (target))
 	  {
 	    *jump_target = *target;
 	    return true;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-104513.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-104513.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4fa78a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-104513.C
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+// PR c++/104513
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+struct A {
+  int a1;
+  short a2, a3;
+  long a4;
+  constexpr A() : a1(42), a2(42), a3(42), a4(42) { return; }
+};
+constexpr A a;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dtor12.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dtor12.C
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..19f9099b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp2a/constexpr-dtor12.C
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+// PR c++/104513
+// { dg-do compile { target c++20 } }
+
+struct S {
+  constexpr S () : s (nullptr) {}
+  constexpr ~S () { delete s; }
+  int *s;
+};
+struct T : S {
+  constexpr T () : S () {}
+  constexpr ~T () { s = new int (42); return; }
+};
+constexpr T t;