From the code in rt_mutex_setprio(), it is evident that the
intention is that task's with a RT 'prio' value as a consequence
of receiving a PI boost also have their 'sched_class' field set
to '&rt_sched_class'.
However, Peter noticed that the code in __setscheduler() could
result in this intention being frustrated. Fix it.
Reported-by: Peter Williams <pwil3058@bigpond.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
LKML-Reference: <
1257880321.4108.457.camel@laptop>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
BUG_ON(p->se.on_rq);
p->policy = policy;
- switch (p->policy) {
- case SCHED_NORMAL:
- case SCHED_BATCH:
- case SCHED_IDLE:
- p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
- break;
- case SCHED_FIFO:
- case SCHED_RR:
- p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
- break;
- }
-
p->rt_priority = prio;
p->normal_prio = normal_prio(p);
/* we are holding p->pi_lock already */
p->prio = rt_mutex_getprio(p);
+ if (rt_prio(p->prio))
+ p->sched_class = &rt_sched_class;
+ else
+ p->sched_class = &fair_sched_class;
set_load_weight(p);
}