sched/core: Avoid spurious lock dependencies

While seemingly harmless, __sched_fork() does hrtimer_init(), which,
when DEBUG_OBJETS, can end up doing allocations.

This then results in the following lock order:

  rq->lock
    zone->lock.rlock
      batched_entropy_u64.lock

Which in turn causes deadlocks when we do wakeups while holding that
batched_entropy lock -- as the random code does.

Solve this by moving __sched_fork() out from under rq->lock. This is
safe because nothing there relies on rq->lock, as also evident from the
other __sched_fork() callsite.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Cc: cl@linux.com
Cc: keescook@chromium.org
Cc: penberg@kernel.org
Cc: rientjes@google.com
Cc: thgarnie@google.com
Cc: tytso@mit.edu
Cc: will@kernel.org
Fixes: b7d5dc21072c ("random: add a spinlock_t to struct batched_entropy")
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191001091837.GK4536@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 0f2eb36..33cd250 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -6019,10 +6019,11 @@ void init_idle(struct task_struct *idle, int cpu)
        struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
        unsigned long flags;
 
+       __sched_fork(0, idle);
+
        raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&idle->pi_lock, flags);
        raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
 
-       __sched_fork(0, idle);
        idle->state = TASK_RUNNING;
        idle->se.exec_start = sched_clock();
        idle->flags |= PF_IDLE;