When we calculate MII, we use two loops, one with iterator R++ to
check whether we can reserve the resource, then --R to move back
the iterator to do reservation.
This is risky, as R++, --R may not point to the same element at all.
The can cause wrong MII.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63536
llvm-svn: 364353
});
for (unsigned C = 0; C < NumCycles; ++C)
while (RI != RE) {
- if ((*RI++)->canReserveResources(*MI)) {
+ if ((*RI)->canReserveResources(*MI)) {
+ (*RI)->reserveResources(*MI);
++ReservedCycles;
break;
}
+ RI++;
}
- // Start reserving resources using existing DFAs.
- for (unsigned C = 0; C < ReservedCycles; ++C) {
- --RI;
- (*RI)->reserveResources(*MI);
- }
-
LLVM_DEBUG(dbgs() << "ReservedCycles:" << ReservedCycles
<< ", NumCycles:" << NumCycles << "\n");
// Add new DFAs, if needed, to reserve resources.
%0 = type { i32, [16 x double] }
-; CHECK: MII = 7 MAX_II = 17
+; CHECK: MII = 8 MAX_II = 18
define dso_local fastcc void @_ZN3povL9polysolveEiPdS0_() unnamed_addr #0 {
br label %1