return false;
}
+ // Check if any of the successors of TailBB has a PHI node in which the
+ // value corresponding to TailBB uses a subregister.
+ // If a phi node uses a register paired with a subregister, the actual
+ // "value type" of the phi may differ from the type of the register without
+ // any subregisters. Due to a bug, tail duplication may add a new operand
+ // without a necessary subregister, producing an invalid code. This is
+ // demonstrated by test/CodeGen/Hexagon/tail-dup-subreg-abort.ll.
+ // Disable tail duplication for this case for now, until the problem is
+ // fixed.
+ for (auto SB : TailBB.successors()) {
+ for (auto &I : *SB) {
+ if (!I.isPHI())
+ break;
+ unsigned Idx = getPHISrcRegOpIdx(&I, &TailBB);
+ assert(Idx != 0);
+ MachineOperand &PU = I.getOperand(Idx);
+ if (PU.getSubReg() != 0)
+ return false;
+ }
+ }
+
if (HasIndirectbr && PreRegAlloc)
return true;
--- /dev/null
+; RUN: llc -march=hexagon -O2 -disable-cgp < %s
+; REQUIRES: asserts
+;
+; Tail duplication can ignore subregister information on PHI nodes, and as
+; a result, generate COPY instructions between registers of different classes.
+; This could lead to HexagonInstrInfo::copyPhysReg aborting on an unhandled
+; src/dst combination.
+;
+define i32 @foo(i32 %x, i64 %y) nounwind {
+entry:
+ %a = icmp slt i32 %x, 0
+ %lo = trunc i64 %y to i32
+ br i1 %a, label %next, label %tail
+tail:
+ br label %join
+next:
+ %c = icmp eq i32 %x, 0
+ br i1 %c, label %b1, label %tail
+b1:
+ %t1 = lshr i64 %y, 32
+ %hi = trunc i64 %t1 to i32
+ br label %join
+join:
+ %val = phi i32 [ %hi, %b1 ], [ %lo, %tail ]
+ ret i32 %val
+}
+
+