For some test cases, a line break gets inserted between the test banner
and the results. For example, with mode=211 this is the output:
[...]
testing speed of rfc4106(gcm(aes)) (rfc4106-gcm-aesni) encryption
[...] test 0 (160 bit key, 16 byte blocks):
[...] 1 operation in 2373 cycles (16 bytes)
--snip--
[...]
testing speed of gcm(aes) (generic-gcm-aesni) encryption
[...] test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks):
[...] 1 operation in 2338 cycles (16 bytes)
Similar behavior is seen in the following cases as well:
modprobe tcrypt mode=212
modprobe tcrypt mode=213
modprobe tcrypt mode=221
modprobe tcrypt mode=300 sec=1
modprobe tcrypt mode=400 sec=1
This doesn't happen with mode=215:
[...] tcrypt:
testing speed of multibuffer rfc4106(gcm(aes)) (rfc4106-gcm-aesni) encryption
[...] tcrypt: test 0 (160 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2215 cycles (16 bytes)
--snip--
[...] tcrypt:
testing speed of multibuffer gcm(aes) (generic-gcm-aesni) encryption
[...] tcrypt: test 0 (128 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 1 operation in 2191 cycles (16 bytes)
This print inconsistency is because printk() is used instead of pr_cont()
in a few places. Change these to be pr_cont().
checkpatch warns that pr_cont() shouldn't be used. This can be ignored in
this context as tcrypt already uses pr_cont().
Signed-off-by: Anirudh Venkataramanan <anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
out:
if (ret == 0)
- printk("1 operation in %lu cycles (%d bytes)\n",
- (cycles + 4) / 8, blen);
+ pr_cont("1 operation in %lu cycles (%d bytes)\n",
+ (cycles + 4) / 8, blen);
return ret;
}
return ret;
}
- printk("%6u opers/sec, %9lu bytes/sec\n",
- bcount / secs, ((long)bcount * blen) / secs);
+ pr_cont("%6u opers/sec, %9lu bytes/sec\n",
+ bcount / secs, ((long)bcount * blen) / secs);
return 0;
}