Summary:
By removing FeatureNoARM implies ModeThumb, we can detect cases where a
function's target-features contain -thumb-mode (enables ARM codegen for the
function), but the architecture does not support ARM mode. Previously, the
implication caused the FeatureNoARM bit to be cleared for functions with
-thumb-mode, making the assertion in ARMSubtarget::ARMSubtarget [1]
pointless for such functions.
This assertion is the only guard against generating ARM code for
architectures without ARM codegen support. Is there a place where we
could easily generate error messages for the user? At the moment, we
would generate ARM code for Thumb-only architectures. X86 has the same
behavior as ARM, as in it only has an assertion and no error message,
but I think for ARM an error message would be helpful. What do you
think?
For the example below, `llc -mtriple=armv7m-eabi test.ll -o -` will
generate ARM assembler (or fail with an assertion error with this patch).
Note that if we run the resulting assembler through llvm-mc, we get
an appropriate error message, but not when codegen is handled
through clang.
```
define void @bar() #0 {
entry:
ret void
}
attributes #0 = { "target-features"="-thumb-mode" }
```
[1] https://github.com/llvm-mirror/llvm/blob/
c1f7b54cef62e9c8aa745d40bea146a167bf844e/lib/Target/ARM/ARMSubtarget.cpp#L147
Reviewers: t.p.northover, rengolin, peter.smith, aadg, silviu.baranga, richard.barton.arm, echristo
Reviewed By: rengolin, echristo
Subscribers: efriedma, aemerson, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35569
llvm-svn: 310476
"Enable Thumb2 instructions">;
def FeatureNoARM : SubtargetFeature<"noarm", "NoARM", "true",
- "Does not support ARM mode execution",
- [ModeThumb]>;
-
+ "Does not support ARM mode execution">;
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// ARM ISAa.
def ARMv6m : Architecture<"armv6-m", "ARMv6m", [HasV6MOps,
FeatureNoARM,
+ ModeThumb,
FeatureDB,
FeatureMClass]>;
def ARMv6sm : Architecture<"armv6s-m", "ARMv6sm", [HasV6MOps,
FeatureNoARM,
+ ModeThumb,
FeatureDB,
FeatureMClass]>;
def ARMv7m : Architecture<"armv7-m", "ARMv7m", [HasV7Ops,
FeatureThumb2,
FeatureNoARM,
+ ModeThumb,
FeatureDB,
FeatureHWDivThumb,
FeatureMClass]>;
def ARMv7em : Architecture<"armv7e-m", "ARMv7em", [HasV7Ops,
FeatureThumb2,
FeatureNoARM,
+ ModeThumb,
FeatureDB,
FeatureHWDivThumb,
FeatureMClass,
def ARMv8mBaseline : Architecture<"armv8-m.base", "ARMv8mBaseline",
[HasV8MBaselineOps,
FeatureNoARM,
+ ModeThumb,
FeatureDB,
FeatureHWDivThumb,
FeatureV7Clrex,
def ARMv8mMainline : Architecture<"armv8-m.main", "ARMv8mMainline",
[HasV8MMainlineOps,
FeatureNoARM,
+ ModeThumb,
FeatureDB,
FeatureHWDivThumb,
Feature8MSecExt,
-# RUN: llc -o - %s -mtriple=arm-arm-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -run-pass scavenger-test | FileCheck %s
+# RUN: llc -o - %s -mtriple=thumb-arm-none-eabi -mcpu=cortex-m0 -run-pass scavenger-test | FileCheck %s
---
# CHECK-LABEL: name: scavengebug0
# Make sure we are not spilling/using a physreg used in the very last