drm/i915/bdw: Support BDW caching
authorBen Widawsky <benjamin.widawsky@intel.com>
Tue, 5 Nov 2013 03:56:49 +0000 (19:56 -0800)
committerDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Fri, 8 Nov 2013 17:09:45 +0000 (18:09 +0100)
BDW caching works differently than the previous generations. Instead of
having bits in the PTE which directly control how the page is cached,
the 3 PTE bits PWT PCD and PAT provide an index into a PAT defined by
register 0x40e0. This style of caching is functionally equivalent to how
it works on HSW and before.

v2: Tiny bikeshed as discussed on internal irc.

v3: Squash in patch from Ville to mirror the x86 PAT setup more like
in arch/x86/mm/pat.c. Primarily, the 0th index will be WB, and not
uncached.

v4: Comment for reason to not use a 64b write on the PPAT.

v5: Add a FIXME comment that the caching bits in the PAT registers
might be wrong due to doc confusion.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> (v1)
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h

index cf539a6..47765d2 100644 (file)
@@ -58,12 +58,21 @@ typedef uint64_t gen8_gtt_pte_t;
 #define HSW_WB_ELLC_LLC_AGE0           HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0xb)
 #define HSW_WT_ELLC_LLC_AGE0           HSW_CACHEABILITY_CONTROL(0x6)
 
+#define PPAT_UNCACHED_INDEX            (_PAGE_PWT | _PAGE_PCD)
+#define PPAT_CACHED_PDE_INDEX          0 /* WB LLC */
+#define PPAT_CACHED_INDEX              _PAGE_PAT /* WB LLCeLLC */
+#define PPAT_DISPLAY_ELLC_INDEX                _PAGE_PCD /* WT eLLC */
+
 static inline gen8_gtt_pte_t gen8_pte_encode(dma_addr_t addr,
                                             enum i915_cache_level level,
                                             bool valid)
 {
        gen8_gtt_pte_t pte = valid ? _PAGE_PRESENT | _PAGE_RW : 0;
        pte |= addr;
+       if (level != I915_CACHE_NONE)
+               pte |= PPAT_CACHED_INDEX;
+       else
+               pte |= PPAT_UNCACHED_INDEX;
        return pte;
 }
 
@@ -806,6 +815,7 @@ static void i915_gtt_color_adjust(struct drm_mm_node *node,
                        *end -= 4096;
        }
 }
+
 void i915_gem_setup_global_gtt(struct drm_device *dev,
                               unsigned long start,
                               unsigned long mappable_end,
@@ -1003,6 +1013,39 @@ static int ggtt_probe_common(struct drm_device *dev,
        return ret;
 }
 
+/* The GGTT and PPGTT need a private PPAT setup in order to handle cacheability
+ * bits. When using advanced contexts each context stores its own PAT, but
+ * writing this data shouldn't be harmful even in those cases. */
+static void gen8_setup_private_ppat(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
+{
+#define GEN8_PPAT_UC           (0<<0)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_WC           (1<<0)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_WT           (2<<0)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_WB           (3<<0)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_ELLC_OVERRIDE        (0<<2)
+/* FIXME(BDW): Bspec is completely confused about cache control bits. */
+#define GEN8_PPAT_LLC          (1<<2)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC      (2<<2)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_LLCeLLC      (3<<2)
+#define GEN8_PPAT_AGE(x)       (x<<4)
+#define GEN8_PPAT(i, x) ((uint64_t) (x) << ((i) * 8))
+       uint64_t pat;
+
+       pat = GEN8_PPAT(0, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLC)     | /* for normal objects, no eLLC */
+             GEN8_PPAT(1, GEN8_PPAT_WC | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) | /* for something pointing to ptes? */
+             GEN8_PPAT(2, GEN8_PPAT_WT | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC) | /* for scanout with eLLC */
+             GEN8_PPAT(3, GEN8_PPAT_UC)                     | /* Uncached objects, mostly for scanout */
+             GEN8_PPAT(4, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(0)) |
+             GEN8_PPAT(5, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(1)) |
+             GEN8_PPAT(6, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(2)) |
+             GEN8_PPAT(7, GEN8_PPAT_WB | GEN8_PPAT_LLCELLC | GEN8_PPAT_AGE(3));
+
+       /* XXX: spec defines this as 2 distinct registers. It's unclear if a 64b
+        * write would work. */
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT, pat);
+       I915_WRITE(GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT + 4, pat >> 32);
+}
+
 static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct drm_device *dev,
                           size_t *gtt_total,
                           size_t *stolen,
@@ -1028,6 +1071,8 @@ static int gen8_gmch_probe(struct drm_device *dev,
        gtt_size = gen8_get_total_gtt_size(snb_gmch_ctl);
        *gtt_total = (gtt_size / sizeof(gen8_gtt_pte_t)) << PAGE_SHIFT;
 
+       gen8_setup_private_ppat(dev_priv);
+
        ret = ggtt_probe_common(dev, gtt_size);
 
        dev_priv->gtt.base.clear_range = gen8_ggtt_clear_range;
index c696779..132b5d0 100644 (file)
 #define   RING_FAULT_FAULT_TYPE(x) ((x >> 1) & 0x3)
 #define   RING_FAULT_VALID     (1<<0)
 #define DONE_REG               0x40b0
+#define GEN8_PRIVATE_PAT       0x40e0
 #define BSD_HWS_PGA_GEN7       (0x04180)
 #define BLT_HWS_PGA_GEN7       (0x04280)
 #define VEBOX_HWS_PGA_GEN7     (0x04380)