The current documention mentions explicitly that EINVAL should be
returned if the device is not available, but nx842_OF_upd_status()
always returns 0. However, nx842_probe() specifically checks for
non-ENODEV returns from nx842_of_upd() (which in turn calls
nx842_OF_upd_status()) and emits an extra error in that case. It seems
like the proper return code of a disabled device is ENODEV.
Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
*
* Returns:
* 0 - Device is available
- * -EINVAL - Device is not available
+ * -ENODEV - Device is not available
*/
static int nx842_OF_upd_status(struct nx842_devdata *devdata,
struct property *prop) {
dev_info(devdata->dev, "%s: status '%s' is not 'okay'\n",
__func__, status);
devdata->status = UNAVAILABLE;
+ ret = -ENODEV;
}
return ret;