In the testcase below, when grokfndecl processes the operator() decl for the
lambda inside the friend function foo, processing_template_decl is rightly 1,
but template_class_depth on the lambda's closure type incorrectly returns 0
instead of 1.
Since processing_template_decl > template_class_depth, this makes grokfndecl
think that the operator() has its own set of template arguments, and so we
attach the innermost set of constraints -- those belonging to struct l -- to the
operator() decl. We then get confused when checking constraints_satisfied_p on
the operator() because it doesn't have template information and yet has
constraints associated with it.
This patch fixes template_class_depth to return the correct template nesting
level in cases like these, in that when it hits a friend function it walks into
the DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT of the friend rather than into the CP_DECL_CONTEXT.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94645
* pt.c (template_class_depth): Walk into the DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT of a
friend declaration rather than into its CP_DECL_CONTEXT.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/94645
* g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda6.C: New test.
+2020-04-23 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94645
+ * pt.c (template_class_depth): Walk into the DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT of a
+ friend declaration rather than into its CP_DECL_CONTEXT.
+
2020-04-23 Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
PR c++/94288
++depth;
if (DECL_P (type))
- type = CP_DECL_CONTEXT (type);
+ {
+ if (tree fctx = DECL_FRIEND_CONTEXT (type))
+ type = fctx;
+ else
+ type = CP_DECL_CONTEXT (type);
+ }
else if (LAMBDA_TYPE_P (type) && LAMBDA_TYPE_EXTRA_SCOPE (type))
type = LAMBDA_TYPE_EXTRA_SCOPE (type);
else
+2020-04-23 Patrick Palka <ppalka@redhat.com>
+
+ PR c++/94645
+ * g++.dg/cpp2a/concepts-lambda6.C: New test.
+
2019-04-23 Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou@adacore.com>
* g++.dg/opt/store-merging-4.C: New test.
--- /dev/null
+// PR c++/94645
+// { dg-do compile { target concepts } }
+
+struct unordered_map {
+ int cend() const noexcept;
+};
+
+template <typename a> concept HasMapInterface = requires(a t) { t.cend(); };
+
+template <typename Mapper> requires HasMapInterface<decltype(Mapper::map())>
+struct l {
+ friend void foo(l opt) { ([]() {})(); }
+};
+
+struct p {
+ static unordered_map map();
+};
+
+void g(l<p> *y) { foo(*y); }