writeback: avoid use-after-free after removing device
authorKhazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@chromium.org>
Mon, 1 Aug 2022 15:50:34 +0000 (08:50 -0700)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Wed, 31 Aug 2022 15:16:47 +0000 (17:16 +0200)
commit f87904c075515f3e1d8f4a7115869d3b914674fd upstream.

When a disk is removed, bdi_unregister gets called to stop further
writeback and wait for associated delayed work to complete.  However,
wb_inode_writeback_end() may schedule bandwidth estimation dwork after
this has completed, which can result in the timer attempting to access the
just freed bdi_writeback.

Fix this by checking if the bdi_writeback is alive, similar to when
scheduling writeback work.

Since this requires wb->work_lock, and wb_inode_writeback_end() may get
called from interrupt, switch wb->work_lock to an irqsafe lock.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220801155034.3772543-1-khazhy@google.com
Fixes: 45a2966fd641 ("writeback: fix bandwidth estimate for spiky workload")
Signed-off-by: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Michael Stapelberg <stapelberg+linux@google.com>
Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
fs/fs-writeback.c
mm/backing-dev.c
mm/page-writeback.c

index 1fd8d09..9761470 100644 (file)
@@ -134,10 +134,10 @@ static bool inode_io_list_move_locked(struct inode *inode,
 
 static void wb_wakeup(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
-       spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
        if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
                mod_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, 0);
-       spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
 }
 
 static void finish_writeback_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
        if (work->done)
                atomic_inc(&work->done->cnt);
 
-       spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
 
        if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) {
                list_add_tail(&work->list, &wb->work_list);
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
        } else
                finish_writeback_work(wb, work);
 
-       spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -2109,13 +2109,13 @@ static struct wb_writeback_work *get_next_work_item(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
        struct wb_writeback_work *work = NULL;
 
-       spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
        if (!list_empty(&wb->work_list)) {
                work = list_entry(wb->work_list.next,
                                  struct wb_writeback_work, list);
                list_del_init(&work->list);
        }
-       spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
        return work;
 }
 
index 02c9d5c..142e118 100644 (file)
@@ -258,10 +258,10 @@ void wb_wakeup_delayed(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
        unsigned long timeout;
 
        timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(dirty_writeback_interval * 10);
-       spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
        if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
                queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->dwork, timeout);
-       spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
 }
 
 static void wb_update_bandwidth_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -337,12 +337,12 @@ static void cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(struct bdi_writeback *wb);
 static void wb_shutdown(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
        /* Make sure nobody queues further work */
-       spin_lock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_lock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
        if (!test_and_clear_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state)) {
-               spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+               spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
                return;
        }
-       spin_unlock_bh(&wb->work_lock);
+       spin_unlock_irq(&wb->work_lock);
 
        cgwb_remove_from_bdi_list(wb);
        /*
index 4812a17..8ca6617 100644 (file)
@@ -2755,6 +2755,7 @@ static void wb_inode_writeback_start(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 
 static void wb_inode_writeback_end(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
 {
+       unsigned long flags;
        atomic_dec(&wb->writeback_inodes);
        /*
         * Make sure estimate of writeback throughput gets updated after
@@ -2763,7 +2764,10 @@ static void wb_inode_writeback_end(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
         * that if multiple inodes end writeback at a similar time, they get
         * batched into one bandwidth update.
         */
-       queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->bw_dwork, BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL);
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&wb->work_lock, flags);
+       if (test_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state))
+               queue_delayed_work(bdi_wq, &wb->bw_dwork, BANDWIDTH_INTERVAL);
+       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wb->work_lock, flags);
 }
 
 int test_clear_page_writeback(struct page *page)