* elements it will do a maximum of 20 comparisons. This is much
* faster than the 1,000,000 comparisons made naively walking the list
* from head to tail, so depending on the number of searches and
- * insertions, it may be worth to eina_list_sort() the list and do he
+ * insertions, it may be worth to eina_list_sort() the list and do the
* searches later. As lists do not have O(1) access time, walking to
* the correct node can be costly, consider worst case to be almost
* O(n) pointer dereference (list walk).
* faster than the 1,000,000 comparisons made by
* eina_list_search_unsorted_list(), so depending on the number of
* searches and insertions, it may be worth to eina_list_sort() the
- * list and do he searches later. As said in
+ * list and do the searches later. As said in
* eina_list_search_sorted_near_list(), lists do not have O(1) access
* time, so walking to the correct node can be costly, consider worst
* case to be almost O(n) pointer dereference (list walk).
* faster than the 1,000,000 comparisons made by
* eina_list_search_unsorted(), so depending on the number of
* searches and insertions, it may be worth to eina_list_sort() the
- * list and do he searches later. As said in
+ * list and do the searches later. As said in
* eina_list_search_sorted_near_list(), lists do not have O(1) access
* time, so walking to the correct node can be costly, consider worst
* case to be almost O(n) pointer dereference (list walk).