The way p_atomic_cmpxchg is implemented on Windows really wants us to
use integers instead of things like pointers. So let's use uintptr_t
here. It seems cleaner to use that than the value zero for the last
argument, because it shows the intent of the code more clearly.
Fixes:
d80d9e1c935 ("zink: queue v3.0")
Reviewed-by: Jesse Natalie <jenatali@microsoft.com>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/11424>
static inline void
zink_batch_usage_unset(struct zink_batch_usage **u, struct zink_batch_state *bs)
{
- (void)p_atomic_cmpxchg(u, &bs->usage, NULL);
+ (void)p_atomic_cmpxchg((uintptr_t *)u, (uintptr_t)&bs->usage, (uintptr_t)NULL);
}
static inline void