selftests/bpf: Improve test coverage of bpf_mem_alloc.
authorAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Thu, 6 Jul 2023 03:34:44 +0000 (20:34 -0700)
committerDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Wed, 12 Jul 2023 21:45:23 +0000 (23:45 +0200)
bpf_obj_new() calls bpf_mem_alloc(), but doing alloc/free of 8 elements
is not triggering watermark conditions in bpf_mem_alloc.
Increase to 200 elements to make sure alloc_bulk/free_bulk is exercised.

Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230706033447.54696-12-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_list.c

index 57440a554304db84733ae7b4ee59351bc7a88ef7..84d1777a9e6c96b7c41f6c0ede0577a20253075a 100644 (file)
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static __always_inline
 int list_push_pop_multiple(struct bpf_spin_lock *lock, struct bpf_list_head *head, bool leave_in_map)
 {
        struct bpf_list_node *n;
-       struct foo *f[8], *pf;
+       struct foo *f[200], *pf;
        int i;
 
        /* Loop following this check adds nodes 2-at-a-time in order to