+2016-10-25 Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
+
+ * constexpr.c (maybe_constant_init): Pull out TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL.
+ (cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr): Don't return a CONSTRUCTOR
+ with CONSTRUCTOR_NO_IMPLICIT_ZERO.
+ (cxx_eval_call_expression): Clear CONSTRUCTOR_NO_IMPLICIT_ZERO.
+
2016-10-25 Jakub Jelinek <jakub@redhat.com>
* parser.c (cp_parser_postfix_expression): Adding missing break;.
entry->result = result;
}
+ /* The result of a constexpr function must be completely initialized. */
+ if (TREE_CODE (result) == CONSTRUCTOR)
+ CONSTRUCTOR_NO_IMPLICIT_ZERO (result) = false;
+
pop_cx_call_context ();
return unshare_constructor (result);
}
non_constant_p = true;
}
+ if (TREE_CODE (r) == CONSTRUCTOR
+ && CONSTRUCTOR_NO_IMPLICIT_ZERO (r))
+ {
+ if (!allow_non_constant)
+ error ("%qE is not a constant expression because it refers to "
+ "an incompletely initialized variable", t);
+ TREE_CONSTANT (r) = false;
+ non_constant_p = true;
+ }
+
/* Technically we should check this for all subexpressions, but that
runs into problems with our internal representation of pointer
subtraction and the 5.19 rules are still in flux. */
t = TREE_OPERAND (t, 0);
if (TREE_CODE (t) == INIT_EXPR)
t = TREE_OPERAND (t, 1);
+ if (TREE_CODE (t) == TARGET_EXPR)
+ t = TARGET_EXPR_INITIAL (t);
if (!potential_nondependent_static_init_expression (t))
/* Don't try to evaluate it. */;
else
--- /dev/null
+// { dg-do compile { target c++11 } }
+// { dg-final { scan-assembler-not "_ZNSt10unique_ptrC1Ei" } }
+
+namespace std {
+ struct unique_ptr {
+ constexpr unique_ptr(int) : p() { }
+ ~unique_ptr() { }
+ void* p;
+ };
+}
+
+void f()
+{
+ static std::unique_ptr p(1);
+}
+
+int main()
+{
+ f();
+}