arm64: KVM: Increment PC after handling an SMC trap
authorMarc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 17:56:07 +0000 (17:56 +0000)
committerCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Tue, 6 Feb 2018 22:53:52 +0000 (22:53 +0000)
When handling an SMC trap, the "preferred return address" is set
to that of the SMC, and not the next PC (which is a departure from
the behaviour of an SMC that isn't trapped).

Increment PC in the handler, as the guest is otherwise forever
stuck...

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: acfb3b883f6d ("arm64: KVM: Fix SMCCC handling of unimplemented SMC/HVC calls")
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c

index 520b0dad3c62bf671d084411ec5b707e93f5d271..5493bbefbd0dedb27f95e02db6b39f8e8c28eb31 100644 (file)
@@ -62,7 +62,16 @@ static int handle_hvc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 
 static int handle_smc(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run)
 {
+       /*
+        * "If an SMC instruction executed at Non-secure EL1 is
+        * trapped to EL2 because HCR_EL2.TSC is 1, the exception is a
+        * Trap exception, not a Secure Monitor Call exception [...]"
+        *
+        * We need to advance the PC after the trap, as it would
+        * otherwise return to the same address...
+        */
        vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, ~0UL);
+       kvm_skip_instr(vcpu, kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu));
        return 1;
 }