net/mlx5e: Check action fwd/drop flag exists also for nic flows
authorRoi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Thu, 12 Aug 2021 06:38:32 +0000 (09:38 +0300)
committerGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Tue, 12 Jul 2022 14:34:54 +0000 (16:34 +0200)
[ Upstream commit 6b50cf45b6a0e99f3cab848a72ecca8da56b7460 ]

The driver should add offloaded rules with either a fwd or drop action.
The check existed in parsing fdb flows but not when parsing nic flows.
Move the test into actions_match_supported() which is called for
checking nic flows and fdb flows.

Signed-off-by: Roi Dayan <roid@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Maor Dickman <maord@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_tc.c

index 3aa8d0b..fe52db5 100644 (file)
@@ -3305,6 +3305,12 @@ static bool actions_match_supported(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
        ct_flow = flow_flag_test(flow, CT) && !ct_clear;
        actions = flow->attr->action;
 
+       if (!(actions &
+             (MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST | MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DROP))) {
+               NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack, "Rule must have at least one forward/drop action");
+               return false;
+       }
+
        if (mlx5e_is_eswitch_flow(flow)) {
                if (flow->attr->esw_attr->split_count && ct_flow &&
                    !MLX5_CAP_GEN(flow->attr->esw_attr->in_mdev, reg_c_preserve)) {
@@ -4207,13 +4213,6 @@ static int parse_tc_fdb_actions(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
                attr->action |= MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST;
        }
 
-       if (!(attr->action &
-             (MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_FWD_DEST | MLX5_FLOW_CONTEXT_ACTION_DROP))) {
-               NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
-                                  "Rule must have at least one forward/drop action");
-               return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-       }
-
        if (esw_attr->split_count > 0 && !mlx5_esw_has_fwd_fdb(priv->mdev)) {
                NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(extack,
                                   "current firmware doesn't support split rule for port mirroring");