ARM process record gets the wrong register number for VMOV (from core
register to single-precision register). That is, we should record
the D register rather than the S pseudo register. The patch also
removes the condition "bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20)" check, which
has been checked above.
It fixes the following internal error,
(gdb) PASS: gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp: BP at end of main
continue^M
Continuing.^M
../../binutils-gdb/gdb/regcache.c:649: internal-error: regcache_raw_read: Assertion `regnum >= 0 && regnum < regcache->descr->nr_raw_registers' failed.^M
A problem internal to GDB has been detected,FAIL: gdb.reverse/finish-precsave.exp: run to end of main (GDB internal error)
gdb:
2016-03-04 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
* arm-tdep.c (arm_record_vdata_transfer_insn): Simplify the
condition check. Record the right D register number.
2016-03-04 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
+ * arm-tdep.c (arm_record_vdata_transfer_insn): Simplify the
+ condition check. Record the right D register number.
+
+2016-03-04 Yao Qi <yao.qi@linaro.org>
+
* arm-tdep.c (arm_record_extension_space): Remove code
printing "Process record does not support".
(arm_record_data_proc_misc_ld_str): Likewise.
/* Handle VMOV instruction. */
if (bits_a == 0x00)
{
- if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20))
- record_buf[0] = reg_t;
- else
- record_buf[0] = num_regs + (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 7) |
- (reg_v << 1));
-
+ record_buf[0] = reg_t;
arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
}
/* Handle VMRS instruction. */
/* Handle VMOV instruction. */
if (bits_a == 0x00)
{
- if (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 20))
- record_buf[0] = reg_t;
- else
- record_buf[0] = num_regs + (bit (arm_insn_r->arm_insn, 7) |
- (reg_v << 1));
+ record_buf[0] = ARM_D0_REGNUM + reg_v;
arm_insn_r->reg_rec_count = 1;
}