Handle correctly global0 and global counters in profile_count::to_sreal_scale

This patch fixes problem in profile_count::to_sreal_scale.  We our porfile
counters can be function local, global (ipa) or function local but globally 0.
The last is used to hold static estimates for functions executed 0 times in
profile.  Now only one 64bit value is stored and if we compute frequency
of global0 counter in global counter we mix them up and return non-zero value
incorrectly.

I also implemented unit test, but will commit sanity checking separately from
fixes: there are multiple bugs in this area I tracked down.

	* profile-count.c (profile_count::to_sreal_scale): Handle correctly
	combination of globa0 and global counters..

From-SVN: r278801

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 7c7ff3f..4ee1806 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2019-11-28  Jan Hubicka  <hubicka@ucw.cz>
+
+       * profile-count.c (profile_count::to_sreal_scale): Handle correctly
+       combination of globa0 and global counters..
+
 2019-11-28  Kewen Lin  <linkw@gcc.gnu.org>
 
        PR target/92566

diff --git a/gcc/profile-count.c b/gcc/profile-count.c
index 4946748..e8602a0 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/profile-count.c
+++ b/gcc/profile-count.c
@@ -310,6 +310,20 @@ profile_count::to_sreal_scale (profile_count in, bool *known) const
     }
   if (known)
     *known = true;
+  /* Watch for cases where one count is IPA and other is not.  */
+  if (in.ipa ().initialized_p ())
+    {
+      gcc_checking_assert (ipa ().initialized_p ());
+      /* If current count is inter-procedurally 0 and IN is inter-procedurally
+        non-zero, return 0.  */
+      if (in.ipa ().nonzero_p ()
+         && !ipa().nonzero_p ())
+       return 0;
+    }
+  else 
+    /* We can handle correctly 0 IPA count within locally estimated
+       profile, but otherwise we are lost and this should not happen.   */
+    gcc_checking_assert (!ipa ().initialized_p () || !ipa ().nonzero_p ());
   if (*this == zero ())
     return 0;
   if (m_val == in.m_val)