There is a precedence bug because | has higher precedence than ?:. This
code was cut and pasted and I fixed a similar bug a few days ago.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
struct fm801 *chip = tea->private_data;
unsigned short reg = inw(FM801_REG(chip, GPIO_CTRL));
struct snd_fm801_tea575x_gpio gpio = *get_tea575x_gpio(chip);
-
- return (reg & FM801_GPIO_GP(gpio.data)) ? TEA575X_DATA : 0 |
- (reg & FM801_GPIO_GP(gpio.most)) ? TEA575X_MOST : 0;
+ u8 ret;
+
+ ret = 0;
+ if (reg & FM801_GPIO_GP(gpio.data))
+ ret |= TEA575X_DATA;
+ if (reg & FM801_GPIO_GP(gpio.most))
+ ret |= TEA575X_MOST;
+ return ret;
}
static void snd_fm801_tea575x_set_direction(struct snd_tea575x *tea, bool output)