gro_cells: avoid using synchronize_rcu() in gro_cells_destroy()
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Sun, 20 Feb 2022 04:11:55 +0000 (20:11 -0800)
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Tue, 22 Feb 2022 19:25:40 +0000 (11:25 -0800)
Another thing making netns dismantles potentially very slow is located
in gro_cells_destroy(),
whenever cleanup_net() has to remove a device using gro_cells framework.

RTNL is not held at this stage, so synchronize_net()
is calling synchronize_rcu():

netdev_run_todo()
 ip_tunnel_dev_free()
  gro_cells_destroy()
   synchronize_net()
    synchronize_rcu() // Ouch.

This patch uses call_rcu(), and gave me a 25x performance improvement
in my tests.

cleanup_net() is no longer blocked ~10 ms per synchronize_rcu()
call.

In the case we could not allocate the memory needed to queue the
deferred free, use synchronize_rcu_expedited()

v2: made percpu_free_defer_callback() static

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220220041155.607637-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
net/core/gro_cells.c

index 6eb2e5e..8462f92 100644 (file)
@@ -89,8 +89,23 @@ int gro_cells_init(struct gro_cells *gcells, struct net_device *dev)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gro_cells_init);
 
+struct percpu_free_defer {
+       struct rcu_head rcu;
+       void __percpu   *ptr;
+};
+
+static void percpu_free_defer_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+       struct percpu_free_defer *defer;
+
+       defer = container_of(head, struct percpu_free_defer, rcu);
+       free_percpu(defer->ptr);
+       kfree(defer);
+}
+
 void gro_cells_destroy(struct gro_cells *gcells)
 {
+       struct percpu_free_defer *defer;
        int i;
 
        if (!gcells->cells)
@@ -102,12 +117,23 @@ void gro_cells_destroy(struct gro_cells *gcells)
                __netif_napi_del(&cell->napi);
                __skb_queue_purge(&cell->napi_skbs);
        }
-       /* This barrier is needed because netpoll could access dev->napi_list
-        * under rcu protection.
+       /* We need to observe an rcu grace period before freeing ->cells,
+        * because netpoll could access dev->napi_list under rcu protection.
+        * Try hard using call_rcu() instead of synchronize_rcu(),
+        * because we might be called from cleanup_net(), and we
+        * definitely do not want to block this critical task.
         */
-       synchronize_net();
-
-       free_percpu(gcells->cells);
+       defer = kmalloc(sizeof(*defer), GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+       if (likely(defer)) {
+               defer->ptr = gcells->cells;
+               call_rcu(&defer->rcu, percpu_free_defer_callback);
+       } else {
+               /* We do not hold RTNL at this point, synchronize_net()
+                * would not be able to expedite this sync.
+                */
+               synchronize_rcu_expedited();
+               free_percpu(gcells->cells);
+       }
        gcells->cells = NULL;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(gro_cells_destroy);