fs/fscache: remove spin_lock() from the condition in while()
authorSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Fri, 10 May 2013 18:50:24 +0000 (19:50 +0100)
committerDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:16:47 +0000 (14:16 +0100)
The spinlock() within the condition in while() will cause a compile error
if it is not a function. This is not a problem on mainline but it does not
look pretty and there is no reason to do it that way.
That patch writes it a little differently and avoids the double condition.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Tested-By: Milosz Tanski <milosz@adfin.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
fs/fscache/page.c

index ff000e5..4882c80 100644 (file)
@@ -796,11 +796,16 @@ void fscache_invalidate_writes(struct fscache_cookie *cookie)
 
        _enter("");
 
-       while (spin_lock(&cookie->stores_lock),
-              n = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(&cookie->stores, results, 0,
-                                             ARRAY_SIZE(results),
-                                             FSCACHE_COOKIE_PENDING_TAG),
-              n > 0) {
+       for (;;) {
+               spin_lock(&cookie->stores_lock);
+               n = radix_tree_gang_lookup_tag(&cookie->stores, results, 0,
+                                              ARRAY_SIZE(results),
+                                              FSCACHE_COOKIE_PENDING_TAG);
+               if (n == 0) {
+                       spin_unlock(&cookie->stores_lock);
+                       break;
+               }
+
                for (i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
                        page = results[i];
                        radix_tree_delete(&cookie->stores, page->index);
@@ -812,7 +817,6 @@ void fscache_invalidate_writes(struct fscache_cookie *cookie)
                        page_cache_release(results[i]);
        }
 
-       spin_unlock(&cookie->stores_lock);
        _leave("");
 }