drm/nv20: Don't use pushbuf calls on the original nv20.
authorFrancisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:54:53 +0000 (12:54 +0200)
committerBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:12:19 +0000 (15:12 +1000)
The "return" command is buggy on the original nv20, it jumps back to
the caller address as expected, but it doesn't clear the subroutine
active bit making the subsequent pushbuf calls fail with a "stack"
overflow.

Signed-off-by: Francisco Jerez <currojerez@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_gem.c

index a915dcd..613f878 100644 (file)
@@ -663,7 +663,7 @@ nouveau_gem_ioctl_pushbuf(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
                                      push[i].length);
                }
        } else
-       if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+       if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
                ret = RING_SPACE(chan, req->nr_push * 2);
                if (ret) {
                        NV_ERROR(dev, "cal_space: %d\n", ret);
@@ -738,7 +738,7 @@ out_next:
                req->suffix0 = 0x00000000;
                req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
        } else
-       if (dev_priv->card_type >= NV_20) {
+       if (dev_priv->chipset >= 0x25) {
                req->suffix0 = 0x00020000;
                req->suffix1 = 0x00000000;
        } else {