[clang-format] PR50525 doesn't handle AlignConsecutiveAssignments correctly in some...
authormydeveloperday <mydeveloperday@gmail.com>
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:28:34 +0000 (13:28 +0100)
committermydeveloperday <mydeveloperday@gmail.com>
Sat, 26 Jun 2021 12:29:16 +0000 (13:29 +0100)
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50525

AlignConsecutiveAssignments/Declarations cause incorrect alignment in the presence of a DesignatedInitializerPeriod (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Designated-Inits.html)

```
static NTSTATUS stg(PLW_STREAM Stream, int identity)
{
     NTSTATUS             status;
     BYTE                 payload[256] = {'l', 'h', 'o', 't', 's', 'e'};
     struct dm_rpc_header header       = {.drh_magic        = DRH_MAGIC,
                                    .drh_op_code      = RPC_OP_ECHO,
                                    .drh_payload_size = sizeof(payload),
                                    .drh_body_size    = sizeof(payload),
                                    .drh_request_id   = 1};
     header.drh_version                = identity;
```

This fix addresses that by ensuring the period isn't ignored

Reviewed By: HazardyKnusperkeks

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D104900

clang/lib/Format/WhitespaceManager.cpp
clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp

index b079eac..ca2222d 100644 (file)
@@ -353,6 +353,10 @@ AlignTokenSequence(const FormatStyle &Style, unsigned Start, unsigned End,
         if (Changes[i].Tok->is(TT_ConditionalExpr))
           return true;
 
+        // Period Initializer .XXX = 1.
+        if (Changes[i].Tok->is(TT_DesignatedInitializerPeriod))
+          return true;
+
         // Continued ternary operator
         if (Changes[i].Tok->Previous &&
             Changes[i].Tok->Previous->is(TT_ConditionalExpr))
index df795e3..e084d06 100644 (file)
@@ -16272,6 +16272,52 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, AlignWithLineBreaks) {
   // clang-format on
 }
 
+TEST_F(FormatTest, AlignWithInitializerPeriods) {
+  auto Style = getLLVMStyleWithColumns(60);
+
+  verifyFormat("void foo1(void) {\n"
+               "  BYTE p[1] = 1;\n"
+               "  A B = {.one_foooooooooooooooo = 2,\n"
+               "         .two_fooooooooooooo = 3,\n"
+               "         .three_fooooooooooooo = 4};\n"
+               "  BYTE payload = 2;\n"
+               "}",
+               Style);
+
+  Style.AlignConsecutiveAssignments = FormatStyle::ACS_Consecutive;
+  Style.AlignConsecutiveDeclarations = FormatStyle::ACS_None;
+  verifyFormat("void foo2(void) {\n"
+               "  BYTE p[1]    = 1;\n"
+               "  A B          = {.one_foooooooooooooooo = 2,\n"
+               "                  .two_fooooooooooooo    = 3,\n"
+               "                  .three_fooooooooooooo  = 4};\n"
+               "  BYTE payload = 2;\n"
+               "}",
+               Style);
+
+  Style.AlignConsecutiveAssignments = FormatStyle::ACS_None;
+  Style.AlignConsecutiveDeclarations = FormatStyle::ACS_Consecutive;
+  verifyFormat("void foo3(void) {\n"
+               "  BYTE p[1] = 1;\n"
+               "  A    B = {.one_foooooooooooooooo = 2,\n"
+               "            .two_fooooooooooooo = 3,\n"
+               "            .three_fooooooooooooo = 4};\n"
+               "  BYTE payload = 2;\n"
+               "}",
+               Style);
+
+  Style.AlignConsecutiveAssignments = FormatStyle::ACS_Consecutive;
+  Style.AlignConsecutiveDeclarations = FormatStyle::ACS_Consecutive;
+  verifyFormat("void foo4(void) {\n"
+               "  BYTE p[1]    = 1;\n"
+               "  A    B       = {.one_foooooooooooooooo = 2,\n"
+               "                  .two_fooooooooooooo    = 3,\n"
+               "                  .three_fooooooooooooo  = 4};\n"
+               "  BYTE payload = 2;\n"
+               "}",
+               Style);
+}
+
 TEST_F(FormatTest, LinuxBraceBreaking) {
   FormatStyle LinuxBraceStyle = getLLVMStyle();
   LinuxBraceStyle.BreakBeforeBraces = FormatStyle::BS_Linux;