Right now we don't output vfork events. Even though we should
always see an exec after a vfork, we may get perfcounter
samples between the vfork and exec. These samples can lead to
some confusion when parsing perfcounter data.
To keep things consistent we should always log a fork event. It
will result in a little more log data, but is less confusing to
trace parsing tools.
Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <
20090716104817.
589309391@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
if (clone_flags & CLONE_VFORK) {
p->vfork_done = &vfork;
init_completion(&vfork);
- } else if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
- /*
- * vfork will do an exec which will call
- * set_task_comm()
- */
- perf_counter_fork(p);
}
+ if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_THREAD))
+ perf_counter_fork(p);
+
audit_finish_fork(p);
tracehook_report_clone(regs, clone_flags, nr, p);