https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/52677
clang-format doesn't format C# switch expressions very well.
Start with this small use case and try and improve the output. I'll look for other examples to add as tests
Reviewed By: curdeius
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115673
Fixes #52677
return false;
if (Right.is(TT_CSharpGenericTypeConstraint))
return true;
+ if (Right.Next && Right.Next->is(TT_FatArrow) &&
+ (Right.is(tok::numeric_constant) ||
+ (Right.is(tok::identifier) && Right.TokenText == "_")))
+ return true;
// Break after C# [...] and before public/protected/private/internal.
if (Left.is(TT_AttributeSquare) && Left.is(tok::r_square) &&
Style);
}
+TEST_F(FormatTestCSharp, SwitchExpression) {
+ FormatStyle Style = getMicrosoftStyle(FormatStyle::LK_CSharp);
+ verifyFormat("int x = a switch {\n"
+ " 1 => (0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0),\n"
+ " 2 => 1,\n"
+ " _ => 2\n"
+ "};\n",
+ Style);
+}
+
} // namespace format
} // end namespace clang