Reading netlink_setsockopt it's not immediately clear why there isn't a
bug when you pass in negative numbers, the reason being that the >=
comparison is really unsigned although 'val' is signed because
nlk->ngroups is unsigned. Make 'val' unsigned too.
[ Update the get_user() cast to match. --DaveM ]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
{
struct sock *sk = sock->sk;
struct netlink_sock *nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
- int val = 0, err;
+ unsigned int val = 0;
+ int err;
if (level != SOL_NETLINK)
return -ENOPROTOOPT;
if (optlen >= sizeof(int) &&
- get_user(val, (int __user *)optval))
+ get_user(val, (unsigned int __user *)optval))
return -EFAULT;
switch (optname) {