When update_ms is set, pstore_get_records() will be called when there's
a new entry. But unlink can be called at the same time and might
contend with the open-read-close loop. Depending on the implementation
of platform driver, it may be safe or not. But I think it'd be better
to protect those race in the first place.
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
if (err)
return err;
- if (p->psi->erase)
+ if (p->psi->erase) {
+ mutex_lock(&p->psi->read_mutex);
p->psi->erase(p->type, p->id, p->count,
d_inode(dentry)->i_ctime, p->psi);
- else
+ mutex_unlock(&p->psi->read_mutex);
+ } else {
return -EPERM;
+ }
return simple_unlink(dir, dentry);
}