re PR c++/60252 ([c++11] ICE with invalid variable-length array in lambda parameter)
authorJason Merrill <jason@redhat.com>
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:50:52 +0000 (16:50 -0500)
committerJason Merrill <jason@gcc.gnu.org>
Fri, 21 Feb 2014 21:50:52 +0000 (16:50 -0500)
PR c++/60252
* lambda.c (maybe_resolve_dummy): Check lambda_function rather
than current_binding_level.

From-SVN: r208028

gcc/cp/ChangeLog
gcc/cp/lambda.c

index 8e4a2a0..dd926da 100644 (file)
@@ -1,5 +1,9 @@
 2014-02-21  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
 
+       PR c++/60252
+       * lambda.c (maybe_resolve_dummy): Check lambda_function rather
+       than current_binding_level.
+
        PR c++/60186
        * typeck2.c (massage_init_elt): Call fold_non_dependent_expr_sfinae.
 
index 7fe235b..277dec6 100644 (file)
@@ -749,10 +749,8 @@ maybe_resolve_dummy (tree object)
   if (type != current_class_type
       && current_class_type
       && LAMBDA_TYPE_P (current_class_type)
-      && DERIVED_FROM_P (type, current_nonlambda_class_type ())
-      /* If we get here while parsing the parameter list of a lambda, it
-        will fail, so don't even try (c++/60252).  */
-      && current_binding_level->kind != sk_function_parms)
+      && lambda_function (current_class_type)
+      && DERIVED_FROM_P (type, current_nonlambda_class_type ()))
     {
       /* In a lambda, need to go through 'this' capture.  */
       tree lam = CLASSTYPE_LAMBDA_EXPR (current_class_type);