KVM: s390: fix pfmf non-quiescing control handling
authorHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Fri, 26 Jul 2013 13:04:01 +0000 (15:04 +0200)
committerPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Mon, 29 Jul 2013 07:02:30 +0000 (09:02 +0200)
Fix the test within handle_pfmf() if the host has the NQ key-setting
facility installed.
Right now the code would incorrectly generate a program check in the
guest if the NQ control bit for a pfmf request was set and if the host
has the NQ key-setting facility installed.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
arch/s390/kvm/priv.c

index 0da3e6e..4cdc54e 100644 (file)
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
 #include <linux/errno.h>
 #include <linux/compat.h>
 #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
+#include <asm/facility.h>
 #include <asm/current.h>
 #include <asm/debug.h>
 #include <asm/ebcdic.h>
@@ -532,8 +533,7 @@ static int handle_pfmf(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
                return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
 
        /* Only provide non-quiescing support if the host supports it */
-       if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ &&
-           S390_lowcore.stfl_fac_list & 0x00020000)
+       if (vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[reg1] & PFMF_NQ && !test_facility(14))
                return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_SPECIFICATION);
 
        /* No support for conditional-SSKE */