re PR rtl-optimization/69535 (wrong code with -O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-reassoc...
authorRichard Henderson <rth@redhat.com>
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:32:01 +0000 (23:32 -0800)
committerRichard Henderson <rth@gcc.gnu.org>
Mon, 1 Feb 2016 07:32:01 +0000 (23:32 -0800)
PR rtl-opt/69535

  * combine.c (make_compound_operation): When looking through a
  subreg, make sure to re-extend to the width of the outer mode.

From-SVN: r233032

gcc/ChangeLog
gcc/combine.c
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69535.c [new file with mode: 0644]

index 0d405cd..bf63f26 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2016-02-01  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
+
+       PR rtl-opt/69535
+       * combine.c (make_compound_operation): When looking through a
+       subreg, make sure to re-extend to the width of the outer mode.
+
 2016-01-30  Jakub Jelinek  <jakub@redhat.com>
 
        PR tree-optimization/69546
index 858552d..c307793 100644 (file)
@@ -7887,11 +7887,25 @@ make_compound_operation (rtx x, enum rtx_code in_code)
               && GET_CODE (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (x, 0))) == LSHIFTRT
               && (i = exact_log2 (UINTVAL (XEXP (x, 1)) + 1)) >= 0)
        {
-         new_rtx = make_compound_operation (XEXP (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (x, 0)), 0),
-                                        next_code);
-         new_rtx = make_extraction (GET_MODE (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (x, 0))), new_rtx, 0,
-                                XEXP (SUBREG_REG (XEXP (x, 0)), 1), i, 1,
-                                0, in_code == COMPARE);
+         rtx inner_x0 = SUBREG_REG (XEXP (x, 0));
+         machine_mode inner_mode = GET_MODE (inner_x0);
+         new_rtx = make_compound_operation (XEXP (inner_x0, 0), next_code);
+         new_rtx = make_extraction (inner_mode, new_rtx, 0,
+                                    XEXP (inner_x0, 1),
+                                    i, 1, 0, in_code == COMPARE);
+
+         if (new_rtx)
+           {
+             /* If we narrowed the mode when dropping the subreg, then
+                we must zero-extend to keep the semantics of the AND.  */
+             if (GET_MODE_SIZE (inner_mode) >= GET_MODE_SIZE (mode))
+               ;
+             else if (SCALAR_INT_MODE_P (inner_mode))
+               new_rtx = simplify_gen_unary (ZERO_EXTEND, mode,
+                                             new_rtx, inner_mode);
+             else
+               new_rtx = NULL;
+           }
 
          /* If that didn't give anything, see if the AND simplifies on
             its own.  */
index 168a74d..d05a689 100644 (file)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2016-02-01  Richard Henderson  <rth@redhat.com>
+
+       * gcc.dg/pr69535.c: New test.
+
 2016-01-31  John David Anglin  <danglin@gcc.gnu.org>
 
        PR testsuite/69584
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69535.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr69535.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..4b4dad1
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+/* { dg-do run { target int128 } } */
+/* { dg-options "-O -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-reassoc" } */
+
+typedef unsigned char u8;
+typedef unsigned short u16;
+typedef unsigned int u32;
+typedef unsigned long long u64;
+typedef unsigned __int128 u128;
+
+void __attribute__((noinline, noclone))
+dirtify_stack(void)
+{
+  volatile char a[] = "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
+                      "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
+                      "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa"
+                      "aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa";
+}
+
+u128 __attribute__ ((noinline, noclone))
+foo(u32 u32_1, u64 u64_1, u128 u128_1, u8 u8_2, u16 u16_2, u32 u32_2, u8 u8_3)
+{
+  u128_1 /= ~u128_1 | 1;
+  u8_3 = ((u8_3 << 2) >> 1) << 7;
+  u32_2 >>= u8_3;
+  return u128_1 + u32_2 + u8_3;
+}
+
+int
+main ()
+{
+  dirtify_stack();
+  u128 x = foo(1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 0);
+  if (x != 1)
+    __builtin_abort();
+  return 0;
+}