re PR c++/47172 ([C++0x] cannot call member function without object)

Fix PR c++/47172

gcc/cp/

	PR c++/47172
	* pt.c (finish_call_expr): Consider a call expression that has a
	dependent "this" pointer as being dependent.  Add comments.
	(dependent_type_p, type_dependent_expression_p): Update comments.

gcc/testsuite/

	* g++.dg/template/inherit6.C: New test.

From-SVN: r170045

diff --git a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
index c3f780abe0494e11994312330d4f25e0d9680f04..98c5668e8527d92bc780e0572607dcc5ea51e9e1 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/cp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+2011-02-11  Dodji Seketeli  <dodji@redhat.com>
+
+       PR c++/47172
+       * pt.c (finish_call_expr): Consider a call expression that has a
+       dependent "this" pointer as being dependent.  Add comments.
+       (dependent_type_p, type_dependent_expression_p): Update comments.
+
 2011-02-09  Jason Merrill  <jason@redhat.com>
 
        * decl.c (cp_make_fname_decl): Set DECL_THIS_STATIC at toplevel.

diff --git a/gcc/cp/pt.c b/gcc/cp/pt.c
index d59f32a7ea787e19cae8c8302957bace259dbae6..a55a35ad4dbfce1aaa55ec5ef31f546156af2640 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -17912,7 +17912,7 @@ dependent_type_p_r (tree type)
 }
 
 /* Returns TRUE if TYPE is dependent, in the sense of
-   [temp.dep.type].  */
+   [temp.dep.type].  Note that a NULL type is considered dependent.  */
 
 bool
 dependent_type_p (tree type)
@@ -18184,7 +18184,10 @@ value_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)
 }
 
 /* Returns TRUE if the EXPRESSION is type-dependent, in the sense of
-   [temp.dep.expr].  */
+   [temp.dep.expr].  Note that an expression with no type is
+   considered dependent.  Other parts of the compiler arrange for an
+   expression with type-dependent subexpressions to have no type, so
+   this function doesn't have to be fully recursive.  */
 
 bool
 type_dependent_expression_p (tree expression)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/semantics.c b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
index 58a59eecacf9b40edf5f74d503b3ed25fcfd1968..a941b3bc74ecf0647780ceb52ca2d588f5314156 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/cp/semantics.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/semantics.c
@@ -2028,8 +2028,20 @@ finish_call_expr (tree fn, VEC(tree,gc) **args, bool disallow_virtual,
 
   if (processing_template_decl)
     {
+      /* If the call expression is dependent, build a CALL_EXPR node
+        with no type; type_dependent_expression_p recognizes
+        expressions with no type as being dependent.  */
       if (type_dependent_expression_p (fn)
-         || any_type_dependent_arguments_p (*args))
+         || any_type_dependent_arguments_p (*args)
+         /* For a non-static member function, we need to specifically
+            test the type dependency of the "this" pointer because it
+            is not included in *ARGS even though it is considered to
+            be part of the list of arguments.  Note that this is
+            related to CWG issues 515 and 1005.  */
+         || (TREE_CODE (fn) == FUNCTION_DECL
+             && DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P (fn)
+             && current_class_ref
+             && type_dependent_expression_p (current_class_ref)))
        {
          result = build_nt_call_vec (fn, *args);
          KOENIG_LOOKUP_P (result) = koenig_p;

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 3b15be96cd48110f47742f7510f5f436f7c55782..99df5e5f3ce7977f970fc9c4b76122ccea562328 100644 (file)
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2011-02-11  Dodji Seketeli  <dodji@redhat.com>
+
+       PR c++/47172
+       * g++.dg/template/inherit6.C: New test.
+
 2011-02-10  Uros Bizjak  <ubizjak@gmail.com>
 
        * gcc.target/i386/parity-1.c: Use -march=k8.

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/inherit6.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/inherit6.C
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..241a68e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/inherit6.C
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+// Origin PR c++/47172
+// { dg-options "-std=c++0x" }
+// { dg-do compile }
+
+struct A
+{
+    int f() const;
+};
+
+template <class T>
+struct B : A { };
+
+template <class T>
+struct C : B<T>
+{
+    void g();
+};
+
+template <class T>
+void C<T>::g()
+{
+    A::f();
+}