// instruction.
ASSERT(value.is_register() && value.reg().is(eax));
// The delta from the start of the map-compare instruction to the
- // test eax instruction. We use masm_ directly here instead of the
+ // test instruction. We use masm_ directly here instead of the
// double underscore macro because the macro sometimes uses macro
// expansion to turn into something that can't return a value. This
// is encountered when doing generated code coverage tests.
int delta_to_patch_site = masm_->SizeOfCodeGeneratedSince(patch_site());
- __ test(value.reg(), Immediate(-delta_to_patch_site));
+ // Here we use masm_-> instead of the double underscore macro because this
+ // is the instruction that gets patched and coverage code gets in the way.
+ masm_->test(value.reg(), Immediate(-delta_to_patch_site));
__ IncrementCounter(&Counters::keyed_load_inline_miss, 1);
// The receiver and key were spilled by the call, so their state as