Cut out some comments that are no longer operative.
Signed-off-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
*/
data = urb->transfer_buffer + 1;
greybus_data_sent(hd, data, status);
-
free_urb(es1, urb);
- /*
- * Rest assured Greg, this craziness is getting fixed.
- *
- * Yes, you are right, we aren't telling anyone that the urb finished.
- * "That's crazy! How does this all even work?" you might be saying.
- * The "magic" is the idea that greybus works on the "operation" level,
- * not the "send a buffer" level. All operations are "round-trip" with
- * a response from the device that the operation finished, or it will
- * time out. Because of that, we don't care that this urb finished, or
- * failed, or did anything else, as higher levels of the protocol stack
- * will handle completions and timeouts and the rest.
- *
- * This protocol is "needed" due to some hardware restrictions on the
- * current generation of Unipro controllers. Think about it for a
- * minute, this is a USB driver, talking to a Unipro bridge, impedance
- * mismatch is huge, yet the Unipro controller are even more
- * underpowered than this little USB controller. We rely on the round
- * trip to keep stalls in the Unipro controllers from happening so that
- * we can keep data flowing properly, no matter how slow it might be.
- *
- * Once again, a wonderful bus protocol cut down in its prime by a naive
- * controller chip. We dream of the day we have a "real" HCD for
- * Unipro. Until then, we suck it up and make the hardware work, as
- * that's the job of the firmware and kernel.
- * </rant>
- */
}
static void apb1_log_get(struct es1_ap_dev *es1)
*/
data = urb->transfer_buffer + 1;
greybus_data_sent(hd, data, status);
-
free_urb(es1, urb);
- /*
- * Rest assured Greg, this craziness is getting fixed.
- *
- * Yes, you are right, we aren't telling anyone that the urb finished.
- * "That's crazy! How does this all even work?" you might be saying.
- * The "magic" is the idea that greybus works on the "operation" level,
- * not the "send a buffer" level. All operations are "round-trip" with
- * a response from the device that the operation finished, or it will
- * time out. Because of that, we don't care that this urb finished, or
- * failed, or did anything else, as higher levels of the protocol stack
- * will handle completions and timeouts and the rest.
- *
- * This protocol is "needed" due to some hardware restrictions on the
- * current generation of Unipro controllers. Think about it for a
- * minute, this is a USB driver, talking to a Unipro bridge, impedance
- * mismatch is huge, yet the Unipro controller are even more
- * underpowered than this little USB controller. We rely on the round
- * trip to keep stalls in the Unipro controllers from happening so that
- * we can keep data flowing properly, no matter how slow it might be.
- *
- * Once again, a wonderful bus protocol cut down in its prime by a naive
- * controller chip. We dream of the day we have a "real" HCD for
- * Unipro. Until then, we suck it up and make the hardware work, as
- * that's the job of the firmware and kernel.
- * </rant>
- */
}
static void apb1_log_get(struct es1_ap_dev *es1)