signal: make sig_handler_ignored() return bool
authorChristian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Wed, 22 Aug 2018 05:00:15 +0000 (22:00 -0700)
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Wed, 22 Aug 2018 17:52:50 +0000 (10:52 -0700)
sig_handler_ignored() already behaves like a boolean function.  Let's
actually declare it as such too.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180602103653.18181-8-christian@brauner.io
Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian@brauner.io>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: James Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
kernel/signal.c

index 0e1bb87..a032a9b 100644 (file)
@@ -65,11 +65,11 @@ static void __user *sig_handler(struct task_struct *t, int sig)
        return t->sighand->action[sig - 1].sa.sa_handler;
 }
 
-static int sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
+static inline bool sig_handler_ignored(void __user *handler, int sig)
 {
        /* Is it explicitly or implicitly ignored? */
        return handler == SIG_IGN ||
-               (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
+              (handler == SIG_DFL && sig_kernel_ignore(sig));
 }
 
 static int sig_task_ignored(struct task_struct *t, int sig, bool force)