[clang-tidy] Recognize [[clang::reinitializes]] attribute in bugprone-use-after-move
authorMartin Bohme <mboehme@google.com>
Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:24:52 +0000 (14:24 +0000)
committerMartin Bohme <mboehme@google.com>
Mon, 13 Aug 2018 14:24:52 +0000 (14:24 +0000)
Summary:
This allows member functions to be marked as reinitializing the object. After a
moved-from object has been reinitialized, the check will no longer consider it
to be in an indeterminate state.

The patch that adds the attribute itself is at https://reviews.llvm.org/D49911

Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, aaron.ballman, alexfh, hokein, rsmith

Reviewed By: aaron.ballman

Subscribers: dblaikie, xazax.hun, cfe-commits

Tags: #clang-tools-extra

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49910

llvm-svn: 339571

clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/bugprone/UseAfterMoveCheck.cpp
clang-tools-extra/docs/clang-tidy/checks/bugprone-use-after-move.rst
clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/bugprone-use-after-move.cpp

index 6fa4cab..ea64549 100644 (file)
@@ -308,6 +308,10 @@ void UseAfterMoveFinder::getReinits(
                cxxMemberCallExpr(
                    on(allOf(DeclRefMatcher, StandardSmartPointerTypeMatcher)),
                    callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasName("reset")))),
+               // Methods that have the [[clang::reinitializes]] attribute.
+               cxxMemberCallExpr(
+                   on(DeclRefMatcher),
+                   callee(cxxMethodDecl(hasAttr(clang::attr::Reinitializes)))),
                // Passing variable to a function as a non-const pointer.
                callExpr(forEachArgumentWithParam(
                    unaryOperator(hasOperatorName("&"),
index 05b0e09..ac16a0a 100644 (file)
@@ -178,6 +178,9 @@ The check considers a variable to be reinitialized in the following cases:
   - ``reset()`` is called on the variable and the variable is of type
     ``std::unique_ptr``, ``std::shared_ptr`` or ``std::weak_ptr``.
 
+  - A member function marked with the ``[[clang::reinitializes]]`` attribute is
+    called on the variable.
+
 If the variable in question is a struct and an individual member variable of
 that struct is written to, the check does not consider this to be a
 reinitialization -- even if, eventually, all member variables of the struct are
index 9307f17..2d747b4 100644 (file)
@@ -107,6 +107,15 @@ public:
   int i;
 };
 
+template <class T>
+class AnnotatedContainer {
+public:
+  AnnotatedContainer();
+
+  void foo() const;
+  [[clang::reinitializes]] void clear();
+};
+
 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 // General tests.
 
@@ -898,6 +907,32 @@ void standardSmartPointerResetIsReinit() {
   }
 }
 
+void reinitAnnotation() {
+  {
+    AnnotatedContainer<int> obj;
+    std::move(obj);
+    obj.foo();
+    // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: 'obj' used after it was
+    // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-3]]:5: note: move occurred here
+  }
+  {
+    AnnotatedContainer<int> obj;
+    std::move(obj);
+    obj.clear();
+    obj.foo();
+  }
+  {
+    // Calling clear() on a different object to the one that was moved is not
+    // considered a reinitialization.
+    AnnotatedContainer<int> obj1, obj2;
+    std::move(obj1);
+    obj2.clear();
+    obj1.foo();
+    // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-1]]:5: warning: 'obj1' used after it was
+    // CHECK-MESSAGES: [[@LINE-4]]:5: note: move occurred here
+  }
+}
+
 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 // Tests related to order of evaluation within expressions