tcp: make tcp_read_sock() more robust
authorEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Wed, 2 Mar 2022 16:17:23 +0000 (08:17 -0800)
committerJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Thu, 3 Mar 2022 06:49:03 +0000 (22:49 -0800)
If recv_actor() returns an incorrect value, tcp_read_sock()
might loop forever.

Instead, issue a one time warning and make sure to make progress.

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220302161723.3910001-2-eric.dumazet@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
net/ipv4/tcp.c

index 02cb275e5487d98b3e124ee102163aac47b2ad6d..28ff2a820f7c935234e5ab7ecd4ed95fb7c5712a 100644 (file)
@@ -1684,11 +1684,13 @@ int tcp_read_sock(struct sock *sk, read_descriptor_t *desc,
                                if (!copied)
                                        copied = used;
                                break;
-                       } else if (used <= len) {
-                               seq += used;
-                               copied += used;
-                               offset += used;
                        }
+                       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(used > len))
+                               used = len;
+                       seq += used;
+                       copied += used;
+                       offset += used;
+
                        /* If recv_actor drops the lock (e.g. TCP splice
                         * receive) the skb pointer might be invalid when
                         * getting here: tcp_collapse might have deleted it