There is a possible race condition vulnerability between issuing a HCI
command and removing the cont. Specifically, functions hci_req_sync()
and hci_dev_do_close() can race each other like below:
thread-A in hci_req_sync() | thread-B in hci_dev_do_close()
| hci_req_sync_lock(hdev);
test_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags); |
... | test_and_clear_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags)
hci_req_sync_lock(hdev); |
|
In this commit we alter the sequence in function hci_req_sync(). Hence,
the thread-A cannot issue th.
Signed-off-by: Lin Ma <linma@zju.edu.cn>
Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Fixes:
7c6a329e4447 ("[Bluetooth] Fix regression from using default link policy")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
{
int ret;
- if (!test_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags))
- return -ENETDOWN;
-
/* Serialize all requests */
hci_req_sync_lock(hdev);
- ret = __hci_req_sync(hdev, req, opt, timeout, hci_status);
+ /* check the state after obtaing the lock to protect the HCI_UP
+ * against any races from hci_dev_do_close when the controller
+ * gets removed.
+ */
+ if (test_bit(HCI_UP, &hdev->flags))
+ ret = __hci_req_sync(hdev, req, opt, timeout, hci_status);
+ else
+ ret = -ENETDOWN;
hci_req_sync_unlock(hdev);
return ret;