The nr_dirty_[background_]threshold fields are misplaced before the
numa_* fields, and users will read strange values.
This is the right order. Before patch, nr_dirty_background_threshold
will read as 0 (the value from numa_miss).
numa_hit 128501
numa_miss 0
numa_foreign 0
numa_interleave 7388
numa_local 128501
numa_other 0
nr_dirty_threshold 144291
nr_dirty_background_threshold 72145
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Rubin <mrubin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
"nr_shmem",
"nr_dirtied",
"nr_written",
- "nr_dirty_threshold",
- "nr_dirty_background_threshold",
#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
"numa_hit",
"numa_local",
"numa_other",
#endif
+ "nr_dirty_threshold",
+ "nr_dirty_background_threshold",
#ifdef CONFIG_VM_EVENT_COUNTERS
"pgpgin",