Because enable_swap_slots_cache can only become true in
enable_swap_slots_cache(), and depends on swap_slot_cache_initialized is
true before. That means, when enable_swap_slots_cache is true,
swap_slot_cache_initialized is true also.
So the condition:
"swap_slot_cache_enabled && swap_slot_cache_initialized"
can be reduced to "swap_slot_cache_enabled"
And in mathematics:
"!swap_slot_cache_enabled || !swap_slot_cache_initialized"
is equal to "!(swap_slot_cache_enabled && swap_slot_cache_initialized)"
So no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200430061143.450-4-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
static void deactivate_swap_slots_cache(void);
static void reactivate_swap_slots_cache(void);
-#define use_swap_slot_cache (swap_slot_cache_active && \
- swap_slot_cache_enabled && swap_slot_cache_initialized)
+#define use_swap_slot_cache (swap_slot_cache_active && swap_slot_cache_enabled)
#define SLOTS_CACHE 0x1
#define SLOTS_CACHE_RET 0x2
{
long pages;
- if (!swap_slot_cache_enabled || !swap_slot_cache_initialized)
+ if (!swap_slot_cache_enabled)
return false;
pages = get_nr_swap_pages();