locking: Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().

rt_rwlock_is_contended() has no users. It makes no sense to use it as
rwlock_is_contended() because it is a sleeping lock on RT and
preemption is possible. It reports always != 0 if used by a writer and
even if there is a waiter then the lock might not be handed over if
the current owner has the highest priority.

Remove rt_rwlock_is_contended().

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129174654.668506-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de

diff --git a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
index b2e553f..9e396a0 100644 (file)
--- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
@@ -257,12 +257,6 @@ void __sched rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
 
-int __sched rt_rwlock_is_contended(rwlock_t *rwlock)
-{
-       return rw_base_is_contended(&rwlock->rwbase);
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_rwlock_is_contended);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
 void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, const char *name,
                      struct lock_class_key *key)