dl_rq->running_bw += dl_bw;
SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < old); /* overflow */
SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > dl_rq->this_bw);
+ /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
+ cpufreq_update_util(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL);
}
static inline
SCHED_WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw > old); /* underflow */
if (dl_rq->running_bw > old)
dl_rq->running_bw = 0;
+ /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
+ cpufreq_update_util(rq_of_dl_rq(dl_rq), SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL);
}
static inline
return;
}
- /* kick cpufreq (see the comment in kernel/sched/sched.h). */
- cpufreq_update_util(rq, SCHED_CPUFREQ_DL);
-
schedstat_set(curr->se.statistics.exec_max,
max(curr->se.statistics.exec_max, delta_exec));
* The way cpufreq is currently arranged requires it to evaluate the CPU
* performance state (frequency/voltage) on a regular basis to prevent it from
* being stuck in a completely inadequate performance level for too long.
- * That is not guaranteed to happen if the updates are only triggered from CFS,
- * though, because they may not be coming in if RT or deadline tasks are active
- * all the time (or there are RT and DL tasks only).
+ * That is not guaranteed to happen if the updates are only triggered from CFS
+ * and DL, though, because they may not be coming in if only RT tasks are
+ * active all the time (or there are RT tasks only).
*
- * As a workaround for that issue, this function is called by the RT and DL
- * sched classes to trigger extra cpufreq updates to prevent it from stalling,
+ * As a workaround for that issue, this function is called periodically by the
+ * RT sched class to trigger extra cpufreq updates to prevent it from stalling,
* but that really is a band-aid. Going forward it should be replaced with
- * solutions targeted more specifically at RT and DL tasks.
+ * solutions targeted more specifically at RT tasks.
*/
static inline void cpufreq_update_util(struct rq *rq, unsigned int flags)
{