These identifiers are bogus. The interested architectures should define
HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS whenever relevant to do so. If this
isn't true for some arch, it should be fixed in the arch definition.
Signed-off-by: Rui Salvaterra <rsalvaterra@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
typedef struct _U16_S { u16 v; } U16_S;
typedef struct _U32_S { u32 v; } U32_S;
typedef struct _U64_S { u64 v; } U64_S;
-#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS) \
- || defined(CONFIG_ARM) && __LINUX_ARM_ARCH__ >= 6 \
- && defined(ARM_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
+#if defined(CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS)
#define A16(x) (((U16_S *)(x))->v)
#define A32(x) (((U32_S *)(x))->v)